just a quick question.

[David1]

hey everyone, I was wondering this for a while now.

And I just couldnt get to understanding it.

but,

why is it that were are now leaving the age Pisces, when Aquarius is actually before Pisces.

shouldnt we have been in Aquarius(obviously that didnt happen, but I just want to know why)

 

[Kait Jordan]

I'm not quite sure why, but it goes in the opposite direction that the zodiac signs do. Maybe someone a little more experienced might be able to answer why.
Hail Enki

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David <[ email redacted ] wrote:

  hey everyone, I was wondering this for a while now.

And I just couldnt get to understanding it.

but,

why is it that were are now leaving the age Pisces, when Aquarius is actually before Pisces.

shouldnt we have been in Aquarius(obviously that didnt happen, but I just want to know why)

 

[David1]

Oh, ok. well I guess thats as good as to understanding it will be.

thats probably the answer then.

thank you.

--- In , Kait Jordan <kaitjordan@... wrote:

I'm not quite sure why, but it goes in the opposite direction that the
zodiac signs do. Maybe someone a little more experienced might be able to
answer why.

Hail Enki

On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David <garimevil@... wrote:

**


hey everyone, I was wondering this for a while now.

And I just couldnt get to understanding it.

but,

why is it that were are now leaving the age Pisces, when Aquarius is
actually before Pisces.

shouldnt we have been in Aquarius(obviously that didnt happen, but I just
want to know why)